How does the ideology New World Order help a country's effort to Essay

How does the belief system New World Order help a nation's push to recognize, comprehend, as well as address overall issues that go past the limit of individual states to illuminate - Essay Example There will a solidarity of religion, some colloquialism that no religion will be educated nor endured. There will be no visas required while going as there will be no outskirts. A similar cash will be utilized everywhere throughout the world. One military will be utilized to implement the laws (Slaughter 9). The entire world will utilize a similar language, monolingual. The New World Order was at first evolved to manage the adjustments on the planet (Mark3). There are such huge numbers of rising issues that are because of things, for example, changing living examples and advancements. The world is developing step by step. It has prompted developing economies. Individuals having the option to have additionally buying force and better ways of life. The progressions have additionally prompted issues in the social, financial and political fronts. The belief system should help control the negative changes. The belief system can be utilized to handle issues and issues confronting both creating and created nations (Slaughter 9). The main issue that can be handled is prejudice. Since the beginning, individuals have been being separated based on their skin shading. By getting one, the issue of bigotry will be disposed of on the planet. As there are not many individuals who practice it in today’s world. Solidarity will see it reach a conclusion. Also, the evacuation of outskirts will prompt financial development. Individuals will have the option to move starting with one nation then onto the next completing business exercises. The expulsion of various monetary forms to have one will likewise help. There will be no compelling reason to trade monetary standards during exchanges. The monetary development won't be credited to one specific nation, yet the world overall. Thirdly, social insurance will be given to everybody on the planet for nothing. Numerous nations are attempting to give free clinical spreads. Created nations like the United States are the main ones that have had the option to give free wellbeing administrations. Absence of clinical administrations has prompted an enormous populace

Importance of distinctive qualities of texts

Writings are written in a manner for it to speak to the responders. The Author utilizes a wide range of strategies, topics and picks a composing style with the goal that it can interest the crowd. This is apparent In the novel We All Fall Down' In which the creator, Robert Cornier, attempts to engage the crowd. This can be accomplished additionally by making the content relatable for responders and certain ideas riches the book. Crosier's utilization of topics In the book Is something which advances to perusers. He centers around connections and particularly family relationships.It is evident that Cornier accepts cap family and family esteems are significant and this subject is visit all through the novel. The topic of family characterizes the book as Cornier shows that holds together can withstand anything, for example, with the Jerome family, anyway with the Walker family, the individuals have self-destructed and have disintegrated. This is intended to speak to responders as they c an identify with the feeling of family inside the book, regardless of whether theirs has self-destructed or clung together as there are instances of both inside the novel.The topic of connections likewise can push the novel intrigue to spenders as they can connect it with the connections they share with others. The tale investigates numerous instances of the two barnacles and connections among individuals and this interests to responders and they can connect the novel with their own lives. The opening of a book Is an Important piece of making a book bid to responders. The main scene snares the peruser with anticipation as we read of the destroying and makes them mindful of the savagery of the content. Fierce action words are utilized to strengthen this topic and start destroying and violence.This subject reoccurs all through the develop. The topic is raised again when the subtleties of the destroying come up over and over and the destroying turns into a huge piece of the content and the activities of the characters as it isn't just the house that has been destroyed yet the characters themselves. The manner in which the content snares the perusers from the beginning is one of the manners in which it bids to the perusers and what keeps them perusing on. The presence of specific characters can assist messages with appearing to more individuals. Without the option of ‘The Avenger' or Mackey ‘Loony' as he Is later known, the novel would be to a greater extent a mantic novel than the spine chiller It became.The Avenger includes a feeling of secret and rushes to the book as we learn of his lethal way. This progress made the book not just intrigue to those looking for a book with sentiment, however one with activity as well. Without the expansion of a few minor characters the story would be totally extraordinary and wouldn't speak to the same number of responders or to such an assortment of responders as it does. The utilization of language can change how a content interests to perusers or responders. Cornier works admirably of utilizing the correct sort of language created the content We All Fall Down. The utilization of informal language just as having the periodic utilization of indecent language causes his books request to responders, particularly adolescents as they can relate the language utilized all through the content. The content doesn't determine separate parts, keeping text streaming between characters as It changes the principal individual. Portrayal and the utilization of the correct language encourages the book to be better comprehended by responders and the various perspectives give enough assortment to keep the book intriguing which with regards to turn causes the content to be moreWe All Fall Down' Imagery is utilized to help the peruser in having the option to picture everything in the book, ending up being a superb encounter for the responder. Facetious inquiries, for example, ‘but I didn't help the young la dy did l? Are utilized to make the peruser consider circumstances and analogies help further portray ideas and emotions in the content for instance, when the manner in which Buddy feels is ‘like a goliath hammer hitting a gong inside him' and reiteration gives accentuation, e. G. ‘l don't need you in the house, don't need you in my life'.And all in all, characteristics, for example, topics of family and connections, expansion of characters, strategies and language just as a relatable content encourages the content to speak to responders. Cornier recognizes this reality and coordinates these into his works thus his works claim to responders of numerous sorts. This is the thing that makes the content We All Fall Down' engaging responders as they feel an association with the content and get it and the thought processes behind the activities of the characters. These unmistakable characteristics of this content are what make it so speaking to responders.

The Blue Whale Essay -- essays research papers

The Blue Whale      Balaenoptera Musculus, or the blue whale, is the biggest warm blooded animal on the planet. This gigantic warm blooded animal can develop to be 110 feet in length and weigh as much as 190 tons. That is longer than two city transports and the absolute load of 30 elephants. This mammoth is fueled by a heart the size of a taxi. The blue whale's of the Antarctic become bigger than those of the Northern Hemisphere. Additionally, the females will in general be marginally bigger than the guys of a similar age. These warm blooded animals are pale blue dark in shading, with some paler spots. Green growth will in general collect on their stomaches causing a yellowish or mustard shading. It has a mottled appearance with a wide, smoothed U-formed head. Fifty to ninety throat grooves run from the mouth to the paunch. Rather than teeth, blue whales have 270 to 400 dark baleen plates on each side of their mouths. These plates are around forty inches in length and twenty-two inches wi de. The blue whale has a little, thickset dorsal balance set far back on its body. It has a 20 foot wide, somewhat indented, triangular accidents, which is impelled by a very thick tail stock. The flippers on this animal are long and slim, and are around one-seventh of the whale's body length. The blue whale's most unmistakable component is its particularly plump splashgaurd, which encompasses the blowholes at the front and sides. This whale rambles a solitary slim stream that takes off forty to fifty feet high.      The blue whale has exceptionally poor visual perception, no feeling of smell, and has no feeling of taste. In any case, the blue whale has all around created faculties of touch and hearing. This huge warm blooded creature has a life expectancy of around eighty years.      At this time there isn't an excessive amount of thought about the blue whale's conduct. Blowing and jumping designs change as indicated by the whale's movement. The blue whale blows each ten to twenty seconds for an aggregate of two to six minutes, when loose, and afterward plunges. They typically remain lowered for five to twenty minutes, however can remain under for as long as 40 minutes. Blue whale's normally jump to around 490 feet, yet can go further if need be. When swimming gradually, the whale ascends at a shallow point. He blows when the head starts to slow down the surface. The head vanishes beneath the surface and a long breadth of the back folds into see. The dorsal balance regularly shows up some time after the... ...ws about blue whales originating from the remainder of the world's seas. California waters may now speak to probably the most basic huge whale territories on the planet. Bibliograpghy 1.     Boitani, Luigi and Bartoli, Stefania 1983. Simon and Schuster's Guide to Mammals. NewYork: Simon and Schuster Inc., p.237. 2.     Singing Blues for the Blues. U.S. News and World Report, July 3, 1989 vol 107, n 1; pp.8 and 9. 3.     Leatherwood, Stephen and Reeves, Randall 1983. The Seirra Club Handbook of Whales and Dolphins. San Francisco: Seirra Club Books, pp. 47-51. 4.     Sattler, Helen Roney 1987. Whales, the Nomads of the Sea. New York: Lothrop, Lee and Shepard Books; pp. 17, 28, 62-63. 5.     Carwardine, Mark 1985. Whales, Dolphins, and Porpoises. New York: Dorling Kindersley Publishing, Inc., pp.68-71. 6.     Lockley, Ronald M. 1979. Whales, Dolphins, and Porpoises. NewYork: W.W. Norton and Co., Inc. p. 88. 7.     Baskin, Yvonne. Blue Behemoth Bounds Back. Bio Science, October 1993, vol 43, n 9; pp. 603-606.

Odyssey and Goddess Calypso Circe Free Essays

Maddy Evans 5 Paragraph Essay Brain-raging Part I: Separation 1. )Call to Adventure  ·Odysseus must go to Troy to battle in the Trojan War 2. )Refusal of the Call  ·At first he can't and expresses that he IS NOT doing battle. We will compose a custom paper test on Odyssey and Goddess Calypso Circe or on the other hand any comparative subject just for you Request Now 3. )Noting the Call  ·Athena reveals to Odysseus that he ought to go battle. So he at last concluded he was going to.  ·He got together weapons/food and set up a team and set sail for Troy. 4. )Otherworldly Aid/Guide  ·Athena, all through, The Odyssey , helps him in all his needs. . )Friends  ·Athena (Godley help)  ·Penelope (Odys’ spouse)  ·Telemachus (Odys’ child) 6. )Intersection the Threshold  ·When Ody Leaves for the Trojan War. 7. )Limit Guardians Poseidon's Monster Polyphemus 8. )Entering the stomach of the whale Odysseus is the sole overcomer of a wreck and finishes in Calypso’s island. Part II: Initiation 1. )Street of Trials 1. Cicones (six men lost from each boat 2. Lotus-eaters (should forcibly drag the inebriated men back to vessels) 3. Cyclops (loses 6 men †puts out Polyphemus’s eye †insults the blinded Cyclops) 4. Aeolus (gives sack of winds to Odysseus) Aeolus 2 (articulates revile on Odysseus after breezes let out) 5. Laestrygonians (loses all boats yet his own) 6. Circe (men went to pigs †moly encourages him get away from her revile †one year in Circe’s home) 7. House [Kingdom] of the Dead (sees Tiresias and Achilles his mom [Anticleia], Agamemnon, et al. ) A. Circe 2 8. Alarms (Odysseus tunes in! ) 9. Scylla and Charybdis (loses six men to Scylla) 10. Cows of the Sun (loses the remainder of his men) 11. Calypso’s Isle 2. )Meeting with the Goddess Calypso Circe 3. )Snatching/Night Sea Journey being Captured by Calypso The outing to Hades 4. )Mythical beast Battle Representing the numerous obstacles Ody must defeat on his excursion home. 5. )Associates In request for Ody to be changed, he should surrender his previous lifestyle. 6. ) Atonement to/Recognition of the dad The finish of Odys venture and is the venturing stone that encourages him accept his legitimate spot as pioneer in the general public. 7. )Extreme Boom The most effective method to refer to Odyssey and Goddess Calypso Circe, Essay models

Worldwide Denial of Global Warming Essay -- Essays Papers Environment

Overall Denial of Global Warming As individuals, we have to regard nature in which we live. This is critical to more prominent our future and that of others to follow. Not very many individuals understand that their every day practices directly affect the earth, the air specifically. By producing destructive gasses into the air regularly is one of the fundamental reasons of such atmosphere changes. Individuals notice such changes but then don't successfully support the circumstance. Small don't understand the dangers that such changes in temperature present. Instead of attempting to moderate gas or scrubbing down, we despite everything go on through our day by day exercises hesitant to change that will in time advantage the earth. By preserving gas and other unsafe outflows like oil and power we are decreasing the dangers of a worldwide temperature alteration. By perceiving the potential dangers, it will get simpler to discover viable arrangements. There have been a few stages toward rationing gas. Cross breed vehicles are turning out to be increasingly more famous among Americans and just as different buyers. These vehicles will utilize less gas to get more mileage. Honda, is taking .strides toward bringing down destructive gasses into the environment by acquainting these cutting edge vehicles with the American open The principle reason for these vehicles is to decrease the reliance on gas for autos. As modest undergrads, we as a whole expertise costly gas is today, wouldn?t you rather set aside all the cash you spend on gas and use it for different things like brew, garments or other recreational purposes. The impacts of an Earth-wide temperature boost will lastingly affect the whole world. All individuals in all countries will encounter grievous results if something isn?t done soon. ... ...ed are called ?renewables.? ?Sustainable power source advances utilize sun oriented, wind, hydropower, geothermal, or biomass vitality? (US EPA). Such new advances are spotless contrasted and customary vitality advances, which consume petroleum derivatives, for example, oil and gas and can be utilized to take care of numerous natural issues. Work refered to Frazier, Ian. ?As The World Burns.? Mother Jones March/Apr. 2003: Vo.28. 2: Academic Search Premier. EBSCO Marshall, George and Mark Lynas. ?Why We Don?t Give A Damn.? New Statesman 21 Jan. 2003: 132. 4666: 18+.Academic Search Premier. EBSCO Schulz, Kathryn. ?An unnatural weather change Right Now.? Drifter 20 Feb. 2003: Iss.916 Academic Search Premier. EBSCO US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). Sustainable power source: The Road from Global Warming To a Cleaner Future Office of Policy. September 1998.

[Guest Blog] CourseRoad!

[Guest Blog] CourseRoad! Danny B. 15 is an 8-Flex/6-3 major with aspirations in both fields. An inhabitant of East Campus(5W) and an active member of the class of 2015, Danny always has his hands full with class work and outside projects. One day a new challenge caught his eye and CourseRoad was created, this is the story of that project. [Disclaimer: What follows is going to be part shameless plug for my website CourseRoad, and part unsolicited advice/storytelling. If that’s not your cup of tea, maybe this will make you feel better :D] Let me start with a piece of advice: you know the thousands of fliers that are posted over MIT bulletin boards? Whenever you get a chance, try to read as many of those as possible. You never know what kind of crazy adventures will follow. This past IAP, I was strolling through the Infinite when I came across a poster for something called “The iCampus Student Prize”. This blue piece of paper stapled to a corkboard at knee height let me know about a competition to build some piece of software to help MIT life in some way. Without much else to do, I kicked around the idea of working on some sort of entry until about a week before the deadline. Finally, I decided “oh hell, why not?” and built a prototype of CourseRoad over Presidents’ Day Weekend. I didn’t quite realize what I was getting myself into at the time. You see, back when I arrived at MIT last fall, I originally told everyone that I wanted to major in 6-3, Computer Science. That was certainly a lot easier to say than responding with “well, probably 6-3, but I also love physics, so maybe course 8 but I dunno yet so we’ll see”. What I did know was that no matter which of the two majors I ended up in, I would certainly be stuffing my schedule with courses from the other. At some point while investigating major possibilities (word play!), you have to figure out what each major requires for graduation. The MIT Bulletin (which holds information on the different departments) contains pages and pages of “degree charts”â€"lists of subject requirements for any possible MIT diploma. Pouring over the lists of X.XXX course numbers is confusing enough; comparing overlap with other majors is even more so. And therein lay a major problem: working out when to take your required classes over four years was hard. The basic idea of CourseRoad, therefore, was to automate a solution to that problem. After hours of tweaking CSS and reading nearly every page of the jQuery and jQuery UI documentation, I built a site that allows users to add classes to a timeline of their academic careers and get immediate feedback on whether they’ve satisfied those classes’ requisites and how they’re doing on their major’s requirements. I was sitting in bio recitation when I got the email that I had won the iCampus Prize. Along with a pretty glass paperweight, the department which ran the iCampus Prize, OEIT (Office of Educational Innovation and Technology, to whom I am endlessly indebted), also offered me a summer job to keep working on the site and improve it beyond the time constraints of the competition and weekly 8.022 psets. (Still not sure how I pulled that one off.) Yes, that is a clip-on 8-bit tie. For the record, Shockfield thought it was some kind of guitar. And here we are today! Over the last few weeks, I’ve been wrapping up main summer development, and my team of beta-testers (to whom I am also endlessly indebted, Nat included :D) has sent me a sizeable swarm of bug fixes and feature requests. I’m now happy to announce that the site is once more open in version 2.0: https://courseroad.mit.edu (You don’t need an MIT account to use the site, but if you don’t have the MIT Certificate Authority installed, you’ll probably get a security error.) One more note: while I was working on CourseRoad to prepare it for the final competitive round, I realized that I was coming up on another important deadlineâ€"declaring a major. Due to my indecisiveness, I decided to attend the Physics Open House (which I found on a flyer! Always check the fliers!). It was perhaps one of the best decisions I made last year. I discovered that the 8-flexible major allows me to flood my schedule with both Physics and Comp. Sci. classes, which I’ve doneâ€"even my HASS is “Systems Visualization”. And yes, I checked it all over on CourseRoad as well. :)

Supreme Court Justice Anthony Kennedy - Free Essay Example

Supreme Court Justice Anthony Kennedy, the last Reagan appointee, was on the United States Supreme Court since 1988, until his recent retirement in 2018. During Kennedys time, he has been viewed as the swing vote placing him in the middle of the two wings of the Supreme Court. Prior to being on the Supreme Court, Kennedy was on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, appointed by former president, Gerald R. Ford. Kennedy was only 38 years old when appointed to the U.S. Court of Appeals, which made him the youngest federal appellate judge in the country. During his time on the U.S. court of Appeals, he established himself to be a distinguished candidate to fill the vacant seat on the Supreme Court created by the retirement of Justice Lewis Powell in 1987. During his time on the Supreme Court, it is safe to say that Kennedys voting pattern was generally conservative. He tended to join conservatives in cases about religious liberty, civil rights, voting rights, and campaign finances. Although, Kennedy frequently cast the deciding vote in cases advancing socially liberal causes that ?discovered new rights in the Constitution, such as gay rights, abortion, restricting capital punishment, and eliminating life sentences for teenage killers. For many of the highest profile cases of his time on the Supreme Court, Kennedy has been the deciding vote. Kennedy once said the cases swing, I dont. He took a case-by-case approach, so he approached every issue individually, regardless of being conservative or liberal, ultimately coining him the swing vote. Some would say Kennedy was a very fair man, although he often clashed with himself. When looking at similar cases, his vote would not replicate a vote he made in a previous case. Kennedy was the deciding factor on many cases during his time and in this paper, I will be analyzing many cases where he played a crucial role in the outcome of the case. Obergefell v. Hodges is a very recent case that took place in 2015. This case is about how a group of same-sex couples sued their relevant state agencies in Ohio, Michigan, Kentucky, and Tennessee. They sued these states because they wanted to challenge the constitutionality of the states bans on same-sex marriage and refusal to recognize legal same-sex marriages. The plaintiffs argued that the states statutes violated the Equal Protection Clause and Due Process Clause of the 14th Amendment. This was a huge case in terms of Kennedys decision. Kennedy wrote the majority decision in which the vote was 5-4. Kennedy was ultimately the deciding vote and in conclusion he said same-sex couples respect marriage and ask for equal dignity in the eye of the law. He claimed that right was granted by the Constitution. He says in the case, No union is more profound than marriage, for it embodies the highest ideals of love, fidelity, devotion, sacrifice, and family. In forming a marital union, two people become something greater than once they were. He also acknowledged that there will always be a debate between people that think marriage should be only between a man and a woman and people who think otherwise. He says how that debate should continue, but the same-sex marriages must be allowed. Kennedy refers to marriage as dignity and he depicts the married state as essential to our most profound hopes and aspirations. He also makes his case that an interest in dignity is central in due process clause of the 14th Amendment. This Amendment states that no state shall deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process law. He argues how dignity is a part of that statement. He also explained the Bill of Rights and how this an evolving document. There is no rule saying deciding what goes on or off it, so this same-sex marriage dispute is protected by that. All in all, he explains how this is an urgent matter, not only for the people today, but also how it will protect the upcoming generations and their freedom to marry the same-sex. The history and significance of Kennedys decision will go down in history, because his decision essentially legalized same-sex marriage. This furthered the case of him being the swing vote. Throughout his career he was mainly conservative, but in this case, he was sided by four liberal justices making the majority vote 5-4. Without Kennedy in this case and his individual approach to each issue, same-sex marriage may not be legal today. Another Supreme Court case where Kennedy made a huge impact is in the Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey. This case took place in 1992 and Kennedy played a huge role in the decision of this case. During this time, the Pennsylvania legislature amended its abortion control law in 1988 and 1989, and among the new provisions, the law required a 24-hour waiting period before the procedure can happen. Minors were required to get consent of at least one parent if seeking an abortion. A married woman had to indicate that she notified her husband that she wanted to get an abortion. These rules and provisions were challenged by several physicians and abortion clinics. This case is directly related to Roe v. Wade (1973) because in this case, they were given the right to abortion. The question in this case is whether a state can require women who want an abortion to obtain informed consent, wait 24 hours, if married, notify their husbands, and, if minors, obtain parental co nsent, without violating their right to abortion as guaranteed by Roe v. Wade? Kennedy was a part of the majority opinion and the ruling was 5-4, in affirmation of Roe v. Wade. They declared that a womans decision to get an abortion implicates important liberty interests and privacy interests that the Constitutions Due Process Clause protects against state interference. These interests form a substantive right to privacy that is protected from state interference in marriage, procreation, contraception, family relationships, child rearing, and education. The court argued that these rights also protect the abortion decision. They then reaffirmed that states could not ban abortions before the viability point, and in no case, may states ban abortions that help preserve the life or health of the mother. When looking at Pennsylvanias provisions on abortion, they only determined that the requirement to notify the husband is unconstitutional. The other provisions were deemed constitutional. Kennedy co-authored this opinion with Justices Sandra Day OConnor and David Souter. As Kennedy is mainly conservative, choosing this majority side is another example of him being the controversial swing vote. Kennedy did choose in affirmation of Roe v. Wade in this case, but his record on abortion-related matters has varied. He consistently voted in favor of pro-life protestors and against laws aimed at protecting women seeking abortions from harassment. He also had some controversial decisions when siding with abortion opponents dealing with partial-birth abortions. Although, in this case specifically, his swing vote was the decisive vote. Many were outraged, but because of his case-by-case approach and his ideology, he chose what he believed was best. Fisher v. University of Texas was another case where Kennedy played a crucial role. Kennedy delivered the opinion for the 7-1 majority. The Texas legislature had previously enacted a law that required the University of Texas to admit all high school seniors who ranked in the top ten percent of their high school classes. The University of Texas found differences in in the racial and ethnic makeup of the universitys undergraduate population and the states population. The university then decided to modify their race-neutral admissions policy which said that they will continue to allow students in the top ten percent of their high school classes in, but for the remainder of students who are outside of that range; the university would consider race as a factor in admission. Abigail Fisher, a Caucasian female, applied to the University of Texas and was not in the top ten percent of her high school class. She was denied by the university. She then filed suit against the university because s he claimed that the use of race as a consideration in admission decision was a violation of the equal protection clause of the 14th Amendment. Kennedy played a major role in this case. His decision was very unexpected which made it that much more impactful. His vote, along with the other justices, essentially denied a challenge to a race-conscious admissions program at the University of Texas. Kennedy had never voted previously to uphold an affirmative action plan. In fact, he has dissented in prior cases about affirmative action. He explained how universities are owed considerable deference when defining those characteristics, like the study body diversity. I believe that decision is odd on his part, due to him not ever voting for affirmative action, but I personally agree with this statement in that universities should have the right to decide who gets accepted. If the university wants to make it more diverse, then they should be allowed to reject people they want and accept different race and ethnic backgrounds. I believe that is a huge problem in todays society. LVC is a predominant white school and it lacks diversity. LVC has taken steps forward to try to get more culture and diversity, but not much has worked. In my opinion, it all depends on the environment which you grew up in and where you grew up. These factors are usually determinants in if you will value higher education. I believe Kennedy upheld the affirmative action because he believes that diversity is a problem in the education system. He once said, it remains an enduring challenge to our nations education system to reconcile the pursuit of diversity with the constitutional promise of equal treatment and dignity. Bush v. Gore is one of the most important cases in U.S. history because it essentially decided the presidency. Some say that Kennedy was the swing vote that allowed this to happen, although this case was a per curiam decision. During the election, there were demanded recounts ordered by the Florida Supreme Court, that all counties in Florida must immediately begin manually recounting all under votes. At the time Governor George Bush, filed a request for review in the Supreme Court and sought an emergency petition for a stay of the Floridas Supreme Courts decision. The per curiam decision held that the recounting ballot was unconstitutional, and they said that no constitutional recount could be done in the time remaining. Kennedy is controversial in this case because along with Justice Sandra Day OConnor, were the only two justices whose names did not appear separately on any of the other opinions, signaling that one or either wrote the unsigned majority opinion. I agree with the court in their decision to write the opinon per curiam. I agree with this because having your name linked to going against the potential president of the United States does not look good for you. Although, it is known and there is a very high chance that Kennedy wrote the majority opinion that basically sent George Bush into office. Kennedy was the decisive vote from the bench that made this happen. Capital punishment is a subject that Kennedy did not shy away from. He has had some very important votes and rulings in capital punishment cases. I will be discussing his impact on Kennedy v. Louisiana and Roper v. Simmons. In both of these cases, Kennedy was thoughtful towards capital punishment. Kennedy v. Louisiana found Patrick Kennedy guilty of raping his eight-year-old step daughter. Louisiana law states that the death penalty can be enforced to those found guilty in the raping of children under the age of twelve. Patrick Kennedy was given the death sentence and he appealed the decision. Louisiana believed that their sentence of the death penalty was justified due to similar laws in five other states and because of the vulnerability of a child. Patrick Kennedy argued that five states do not constitute a national consensus for the purposes of the Eighth Amendment, and he believed the law was singling out black child rapists as opposed to white child rapists. Justice Kennedy wrote the majority opinion which was a 5-4 decision. This decision was in favor of overturning the death penalty laws in Louisiana and the five other states. In the majority opinion Kennedy said there was a distinction between intentional first-degree murder on the one hand and non-homicide crimes against individual persons even devastating crimes like the rape of a child, on the other. Kennedy believes that the courts jurisprudence on the death penalty remains sound. Kennedy reasons for voting against the death penalty had to do with how the five other states laws were, as in they had to have a prior rape conviction in order to be subject to the death penalty. Also, he said how the death penalty presented problems when dealing with children. The problem was with special risks of an unreliable testimony by children and that crime often happens within the family. This could lead to the problem of underreporting of these crimes because they know the punishment; they mig ht want to protect a family member since the penalty is so severe. Being in Kennedys position here would be very tough for many people. Everyone wants justice, but many problems arise when enacting a death penalty sentence. Personally, in this situation with the rape of a child, I believe the death penalty is appropriate. I think keeping someone through the prison system would ultimately cost more money as opposed to their death. Especially since laws were already in place, I believe they should have been followed through. Kennedys impact on this case decided the life of a man. If that is not impactful, then I do not know what is. The other capital punishment case I am going to talk about is Roper v. Simmons. This case took place before the previous case discussed. This case is about a 17-year-old boy named Christopher Simmons, who was sentenced to death in 1993. Then, in 2002, the Missouri Supreme Court reconsidered Simmons execution after ruling that sentencing the mentally disabled to death was against the 8th and 14th Amendment. Missouri saw that national opinion has changed and they decided to say these laws that allows the sentence of the death penalty to a minor is unconstitutional. On appeal to the Supreme Court, the government argued that allowing a state to overturn the Supreme Court due to evolving standards is very dangerous. In a 5-4 majority opinion written by Justice Kennedy, he was again the deciding factor on another controversial case. He sided with the liberal bloc on this and said that standards of decency have evolved so that executing minors is cruel and unusual punishment prohibited by the Eighth Amendment. The court also looked out the international opinion against the death penalty. The U.S. was the last country to put this law into place. Although Kennedy voting against capital punishment here, he once before voted for it against juvenile offenders, but he is a believer of the evolving standards. Kennedys views and rulings on capital punishment will go far beyond his years. His swing vote in this case was another decisive vote that essentially made another law preventing the death penalty being places on minors. I am in full acceptance of this because I am with Kennedy in the fact that young people are still developing and should not be held accountable at that level. I do believe in justice, but executing a minor would be against what I would want and now because of the evolving standards; against what Kennedy wants. The next case I will talk about is a gun rights case that took place in 2008, District of Columbia v. Heller. In this case, Kennedy was the swing vote yet again. This case was about how the District of Columbia made it illegal to carry an unregistered firearm and prohibited the registrations of handguns, so essentially there was no compromise to be able to carry a handgun. The only exception is if the chief of police authorized you a one-year license to carry. The law also said how if you did legally own one, it had to be unloaded and disassembled. Dick Anthony Heller was a District of Columbia special police officer who was authorized to carry a gun on duty. He applied for a one-year personal handgun that he could keep at home and was denied. He sued the District of Columbia. He argued that these laws violated his Second Amendment. He wanted one for self-defense at home and since the gun had to be disassembled, he argued that violated his rights. Kennedys role in this case was crucial in the 5-4 majority opinion. He was the swing vote that essentially lifted the ban on guns in D.C. He believed, just like the four other justices that citizens should have the right to bear arms and that they should have the right to self-defense at home. The court made references to a militia but these justices agree that should not be confined to just people in the military because the term once referred to all able-bodied men who were capable of being called to such service. Kennedy was the ultimate swing vote during his time when dealing with gun rights. Other than this case, Kennedy was also in support of the McDonald decision that recognized an individual to bear arms both in and outside the home. However, since that case in 2010, the Supreme Court has declined to take any Second Amendment cases in almost a decade. Many think, that Kennedy had lost his appetite for future gun rights cases. I believe this could have been since Kennedy knew he was nearing his retirement, he would not vote to hear these cases because of the controversy they cause. Gun rights is a huge and sensitive subject in the United States today. All the mass shootings and other shootings going on today, make this subject very sensitive to many Americans. I do not agree with them almost ignoring the subject and not hearing these cases, but I do understand why Kennedy does not want to hear these cases. Also, with Kennedy being the swing vote so much backlash would come back on him in whatever decision he would make. If he goes for stronger gun rights, it upsets people and if he is against it, it upsets people. There is really no good choice for Kennedy in gun rights cases. The last case I will be writing about where Kennedy played a major role is Citizens United v. FEC. In this case, Citizens United sought an injunction against the FEC to prevent the application of the Bipartisan Campaign Reform to its film Hillary: The Movie. This movie basically explains how she would be a good president. Federal law sets strict limits on the ability of corporations and unions to spend and attempt to influence elections. This case put campaign finance restrictions against Citizens Uniteds claim that businesses have First Amendment free speech rights. Kennedy wrote the majority decision which was 5-4. Kennedy sided with the company and put down limits on independent campaign spending by corporations and unions. Kennedy in writing for the majority said, when government seeks to use its full power, including the criminal law, to command